Posts Tagged Noise

Meeting with Dato Ketua Pengarah of LLM

Meeting with Dato Ketua PengarahLast week on 24 June 2009, Dato’ Ketua Pengarah of Lembaga Lebuhraya Malaysia organized a meeting to meet the residents representatives regarding the issues highlighted in our email earlier. It was a well represented meeting with relevant organizations like Kementerian Kerja Raya (KKR), Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur (DBKL), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), highway concessionaire and of course LLM themselves.

The meeting provided a platform for us to reestablish our long forgotten struggle and reengage with LLM to seek a resolution to our issues. We were also glad that we were able to share our concerns and highlight any incorrect information that was provided to Dato’ Ketua Pengarah previously.

We presented 3 key issues of which we are seeking resolution to immediately. They are :

1. Long outstanding decision for an amicable solution
Independent studies by Biro Pengaduan Awam and Jabatan Audit Negara confirmed the flaws in the approval of the highway project which has caused a negative impact to the residents. They have recommended the Government to find a solution which included the acquisition of all the affected houses or provide compensation on any loss incurred by the affected residents.

Based on our previous survey conducted with the affected residents, the majority wanted compensation for the loss of market value and cost to mitigate air and noise pollution (eg. installing air conditioning system, double glazed windows, ionisers and exhaust fans).

2. Noise pollution far exceeded the limit approved
Sound engineer sharing expertiseWe also presented our findings where the noise levels have exceeded the approved limit stated in the condition of EIA approval.

We hope that Government is able to provide a better quality of life for the residents living next to the highway by installing noise barriers of appropriate height for both above in the elevated section and below the highway to mitigate the noise impact to the level in compliance with the EIA approval.

3. Outstanding repair work / compensation for houses with cracks
We also highlighted to Dato’ Ketua Pengarah that the repair work / compensation for houses with cracks and the monitoring work by DBKL have halted.

We believe that Dato’ Ketua Pengarah will be able to conduct a thorough review of the progress and resume the initiative to repair / compensate the cracked houses

We sent in an official letter summarizing our meeting with LLM on June 26 of which Dato’ Ketua Pengarah had replied indicating that he will be preparing a report to be sent to Ministry of Works while some of the items needs to be brought to the Minister’s attention for resolution.

We would like to thank Dato’ for looking into this matter on behalf of the affected residents and hopefully we can see the light soon.

The exact details of our letter can be found here. [page 1][page 2][page 3][page 4]

, , , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment

(sub)STANDARD reply from LLM

Tan Sri Mohd Sidek

Tan Sri Mohd Sidek

First of all, we would like to thank Tan Sri Mohd Sidek who had acted on our email sent on 28 May 2009 swiftly. He requested Kementerian Kerja Raya and its associated agencies to reply to our email.  Tan Sri sent the email out on June 11 2009 and subsequently we received a reply from Ketua Pengarah of LLM, Dato’ Ir. Hj. Ismail bin Md. Salleh, on June 12.

According to a key paragraph of the reply, the Government is studying our request to take over the houses affected by the highway but it involves high cost and will take some time to conclude.

Ketua Pengarah LLMIn LLM’s reply to address our current concern, the points to note are;

1. The developer is still in the process of fixing all the houses damaged by the construction for the cooperative residents

2. Noise pollution readings taken in April 2008 last year indicates that the noise level is below the requirement of Jabatan Alam Sekitar and in fact it is now lower than before the highway was constructed.

3. If the concern of safety is still there, the authorities will raise the parapet wall above the highway to 1.8m (6 feet)

From the looks of the reply, it it seems Dato’ Ir. Hj. Ismail bin Md. Salleh has not been given the correct update, and is probably too busy to investigate the facts. The reply clearly demonstrated that the department which is handling the project implementation is giving a standard and outdated answer without much understanding and concern on the whole matter.

Let us analyse the reply.

a. “LLM claims that to take over the houses would be very costly and therefore need to study the proposal carefully”.  First of all, the current issues arise as a result of the Lembaga Lebuhraya Malaysia’s blunder. The residents shouldn’t be put to unnecessary suffering any further and the agency should proactively seek engagement with the affected residents to find ways to solve the current issue.  As of our record, LLM has been ignoring us since Apr 2008 last year.

b. “The developer is still in the process of fixing the houses damaged by the construction for the cooperative residents”. The process is taking too long a time to complete and presently there has not been any updates to the residents so far. Imagine, the highway has been completed and launched but some of the houses issues have not been resolved. We question LLM’s commitment to resolve the issue.

c. “Noise pollution readings taken in April 2008 last year indicates that the noise level is below the requirement of Jabatan Alam Sekitar and in fact it is now lower than before the highway was constructed”. This is the most absurd point of them all. Even a ten year old will be able to tell you that when you build a concrete structure above your roof, the noise would have no place to disperse and the echo effect would be increased thereby making it louder. How can it be lower than before the highway is built? Does that mean the residents should thank LLM for putting the highway above our houses? Clearly, such a reply would not come from a Ketua Pengarah!

d. “If the concern of safety is still there, the authorities will raise the parapet wall above the highway to 1.8m (6 feet)”. The parapet wall of 1.8m in height was promised by the Minister of Works and should be done immediately.

Here is the email reply. (Some of the personal contact information has been removed)


From: Dato’ Ir. Ismail Md. Salleh <Ismail@llmnet.gov.my>

Date: Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 5:15 PM
Subject: RE: KL-Putrajaya Highway - Unresolved issues in Sri Petaling Read the rest of this entry »

, , , ,

No Comments

DBKL never learns!

There is an article in The Star Online today which has the following title “Residents claim proposed LRT lines too close to homes“. It looks like DBKL never learns. Despite the previous blunder which has caused the KL - Putrajaya highway to be built 2 metres away from our homes in Seri Petaling, now they will make the residents in Taman Esplanad in Bukit Jalil suffer what we have gone through during the construction.

Incidentally, it seems like DBKL is making a lot of major blunders in this part of the city, we wonder why?

Here is the full story from The Star Online

Residents claim proposed LRT lines too close to homes
By BAVANI M

MORE than a hundred residents living in Taman Esplanad in Bukit Jalil Kuala Lumpur staged a peaceful protest on Saturday to object to a proposed LRT extension running through their neighbourhood.

The residents are worried that if approved, the lines located some 12 metres from their backyard, will pose problems to those living in the area.

“The LRT alignments were proposed in the Draft Kuala Lumpur City Plan 2020 (DKLCP2020) and we had already made our objections at a public hearing committee last year. But, we were surprised to discover that soil investigation work is currently being carried out at the site,” said a resident who only wished to be identified as Soh. Read the rest of this entry »

, , , ,

No Comments

LLM impact survey follow up

Mr Lau, Tan and Au met up with Dato’ Shahrir on 21 Oct 2008 at Parliament. We updated him on our follow-up actions and conveyed to him re our proposed resolutions (immediate and long term). He agreed to bring the matter to the Minister and Cabinet.

Here is the follow up letter to LLM we sent recently. Basically we would like to know the next action after the completion of the impact survey. We hope they can mitigate the impact of noise and dust pollution immediately

We will be counting the time it takes for them to respond to us again.

, , , ,

No Comments

Some feedback…

Dear Lau,

I met one of the residents at the coffee shop, he is complaining the Mat Rempit issue! According to him, due to the straight road leading from 2/149 to Kuchai Lama, the illegal racing by both motorcycle and car had created sharp noise during midnight.

He propose to put up speed breaker such as road hump!

As for myself, due to traffic volume has increased since the opening of the road, the noise is unbearable especially on the wee hours especially around 5.30 to 6am. Normally i woke up this time due to noise.

I m seriuosly thinking of moving out ASAP if i can buy a new house nearby due to the noise. It’s really affected my living stantard!!

DBKL should PUT UP the noise barrier as agreed ASAP!

Other residents might be fed up with current situation and therefore they choose not to do anything even complaining.

I think the noise might not affected 2/149K that much if comparing to 2/149J as their houses stood on the higher groud!

Thanks

Best Regards
< identity withdrawn >

, ,

No Comments

Hand over inspection by DBKL

Letter of issues outstanding

YB and DBKL visited Jalan 2/149 pn Nov 16 2007, Friday morning. The purpose is to ensure all things are in order before approving the hand-over of Jalan 2/149 back to DBKL by Maju Holdings (concessionaire for the highway). However, there are still some unresolved issues with regards to the current traffic, noise and safety. The residents wanted DBKL to ensure these issues are resolved before approving the hand-over.

The inspection team came and greeted by the residents reps and the concessionaire. We highlighted the current issues as per our last request which was not fulfilled. No conclusion could be obtained and the handover of the road back to DBKL could not proceed.

, , , , , , ,

No Comments