Meeting with Dato Ketua Pengarah of LLM

Meeting with Dato Ketua PengarahLast week on 24 June 2009, Dato’ Ketua Pengarah of Lembaga Lebuhraya Malaysia organized a meeting to meet the residents representatives regarding the issues highlighted in our email earlier. It was a well represented meeting with relevant organizations like Kementerian Kerja Raya (KKR), Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur (DBKL), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), highway concessionaire and of course LLM themselves.

The meeting provided a platform for us to reestablish our long forgotten struggle and reengage with LLM to seek a resolution to our issues. We were also glad that we were able to share our concerns and highlight any incorrect information that was provided to Dato’ Ketua Pengarah previously.

We presented 3 key issues of which we are seeking resolution to immediately. They are :

1. Long outstanding decision for an amicable solution
Independent studies by Biro Pengaduan Awam and Jabatan Audit Negara confirmed the flaws in the approval of the highway project which has caused a negative impact to the residents. They have recommended the Government to find a solution which included the acquisition of all the affected houses or provide compensation on any loss incurred by the affected residents.

Based on our previous survey conducted with the affected residents, the majority wanted compensation for the loss of market value and cost to mitigate air and noise pollution (eg. installing air conditioning system, double glazed windows, ionisers and exhaust fans).

2. Noise pollution far exceeded the limit approved
Sound engineer sharing expertiseWe also presented our findings where the noise levels have exceeded the approved limit stated in the condition of EIA approval.

We hope that Government is able to provide a better quality of life for the residents living next to the highway by installing noise barriers of appropriate height for both above in the elevated section and below the highway to mitigate the noise impact to the level in compliance with the EIA approval.

3. Outstanding repair work / compensation for houses with cracks
We also highlighted to Dato’ Ketua Pengarah that the repair work / compensation for houses with cracks and the monitoring work by DBKL have halted.

We believe that Dato’ Ketua Pengarah will be able to conduct a thorough review of the progress and resume the initiative to repair / compensate the cracked houses

We sent in an official letter summarizing our meeting with LLM on June 26 of which Dato’ Ketua Pengarah had replied indicating that he will be preparing a report to be sent to Ministry of Works while some of the items needs to be brought to the Minister’s attention for resolution.

We would like to thank Dato’ for looking into this matter on behalf of the affected residents and hopefully we can see the light soon.

The exact details of our letter can be found here. [page 1][page 2][page 3][page 4]

, , , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment

(sub)STANDARD reply from LLM

Tan Sri Mohd Sidek

Tan Sri Mohd Sidek

First of all, we would like to thank Tan Sri Mohd Sidek who had acted on our email sent on 28 May 2009 swiftly. He requested Kementerian Kerja Raya and its associated agencies to reply to our email.  Tan Sri sent the email out on June 11 2009 and subsequently we received a reply from Ketua Pengarah of LLM, Dato’ Ir. Hj. Ismail bin Md. Salleh, on June 12.

According to a key paragraph of the reply, the Government is studying our request to take over the houses affected by the highway but it involves high cost and will take some time to conclude.

Ketua Pengarah LLMIn LLM’s reply to address our current concern, the points to note are;

1. The developer is still in the process of fixing all the houses damaged by the construction for the cooperative residents

2. Noise pollution readings taken in April 2008 last year indicates that the noise level is below the requirement of Jabatan Alam Sekitar and in fact it is now lower than before the highway was constructed.

3. If the concern of safety is still there, the authorities will raise the parapet wall above the highway to 1.8m (6 feet)

From the looks of the reply, it it seems Dato’ Ir. Hj. Ismail bin Md. Salleh has not been given the correct update, and is probably too busy to investigate the facts. The reply clearly demonstrated that the department which is handling the project implementation is giving a standard and outdated answer without much understanding and concern on the whole matter.

Let us analyse the reply.

a. “LLM claims that to take over the houses would be very costly and therefore need to study the proposal carefully”.  First of all, the current issues arise as a result of the Lembaga Lebuhraya Malaysia’s blunder. The residents shouldn’t be put to unnecessary suffering any further and the agency should proactively seek engagement with the affected residents to find ways to solve the current issue.  As of our record, LLM has been ignoring us since Apr 2008 last year.

b. “The developer is still in the process of fixing the houses damaged by the construction for the cooperative residents”. The process is taking too long a time to complete and presently there has not been any updates to the residents so far. Imagine, the highway has been completed and launched but some of the houses issues have not been resolved. We question LLM’s commitment to resolve the issue.

c. “Noise pollution readings taken in April 2008 last year indicates that the noise level is below the requirement of Jabatan Alam Sekitar and in fact it is now lower than before the highway was constructed”. This is the most absurd point of them all. Even a ten year old will be able to tell you that when you build a concrete structure above your roof, the noise would have no place to disperse and the echo effect would be increased thereby making it louder. How can it be lower than before the highway is built? Does that mean the residents should thank LLM for putting the highway above our houses? Clearly, such a reply would not come from a Ketua Pengarah!

d. “If the concern of safety is still there, the authorities will raise the parapet wall above the highway to 1.8m (6 feet)”. The parapet wall of 1.8m in height was promised by the Minister of Works and should be done immediately.

Here is the email reply. (Some of the personal contact information has been removed)


From: Dato’ Ir. Ismail Md. Salleh <Ismail@llmnet.gov.my>

Date: Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 5:15 PM
Subject: RE: KL-Putrajaya Highway - Unresolved issues in Sri Petaling Read the rest of this entry »

, , , ,

No Comments

Email to Tan Sri Mohd Sidek again..

The committee members had a meeting last week to update the status of our struggle. Despite our busy schedules, we managed to make time at our usual mamak place for a night meeting.

Apparently, the Government had not responded to our correspondences. All the promises for a quick and efficient administration seems to be just hearsay. We have been waiting for 15 months now since our letter to the Prime Minister who had promised to look into our matter and come up with a solution. The letter dated 1 July 2007 can be found here [page 1, page 2, page 3]. Subsequently we received a letter of acknowledgment stating that the Prime Ministers office has received our letter on 26 July 2007 [page 1].

We have also sent a reminder letter to our Prime Minister on 19 Sept 2007 as we did not receive any response from the PMO since the letter of acknowledgment [page 1, page 2, page 3].

Here is our latest email to Tan Sri Mohd Sidek sent on 28 May 2009. Oh yes, we attached all the letters we previously sent to him too. We hope there will be a response this time.
—————————–
Dear Tan Sri,

Congratulations for your extension of service to the Government of Malaysia.  I hope this email find you well.

I would like to keep Tan Sri informed that since we last communicated about the highway issues facing the residents of Sri Petaling Kuala Lumpur on 10 Feb 2008, we have followed up with TKP LLM, Ir. Ismail Md. Salleh as suggested by Tan Sri.

We regret to inform Tan Sri that till today (after 15 months), there are no responses nor resolutions nor updates from the authorities.  While we understand Tan Sri’s commitment to drive service excellent among public service delivery, this bad experience that we are facing is clearly a contradictory to what Tan Sri intended to achieve!

We hope Tan Sri will inquire what has gone wrong in the process and we are always ready to work with Tan Sri to resolve the issues facing our residents.

Thank you.

Yours truly,

Lau Kien Foh (Mr)
Chairman
Highway Action Committee
Sri Petaling Resident Association, Kuala Lumpur

, ,

No Comments

DBKL never learns!

There is an article in The Star Online today which has the following title “Residents claim proposed LRT lines too close to homes“. It looks like DBKL never learns. Despite the previous blunder which has caused the KL - Putrajaya highway to be built 2 metres away from our homes in Seri Petaling, now they will make the residents in Taman Esplanad in Bukit Jalil suffer what we have gone through during the construction.

Incidentally, it seems like DBKL is making a lot of major blunders in this part of the city, we wonder why?

Here is the full story from The Star Online

Residents claim proposed LRT lines too close to homes
By BAVANI M

MORE than a hundred residents living in Taman Esplanad in Bukit Jalil Kuala Lumpur staged a peaceful protest on Saturday to object to a proposed LRT extension running through their neighbourhood.

The residents are worried that if approved, the lines located some 12 metres from their backyard, will pose problems to those living in the area.

“The LRT alignments were proposed in the Draft Kuala Lumpur City Plan 2020 (DKLCP2020) and we had already made our objections at a public hearing committee last year. But, we were surprised to discover that soil investigation work is currently being carried out at the site,” said a resident who only wished to be identified as Soh. Read the rest of this entry »

, , , ,

No Comments

Why we want to see the toll concession agreement for MEX (KL-Putrajaya Highway)?

The Government made some toll concession agreement public recently. As reported by The Star Online, the revelation of the agreements was announced way back in Oct 17, 2008. Unfortunately, they did not reveal the concession agreement for Maju Expressway (KL-Putrajaya Highway). Apparently, MEX did not want the agreement to be revealed.

We are very doubtful in the enforcement of the agreement between Maju and the Government. We believe certain terms and conditions were breached and this would have led to residents having to suffer more than expected. We believe that opening the Seri Petaling interchange is illegal! This is because during the project conceptualization, the KL-Putrajaya highway should have been a protocol highway all the way from Kuala Lumpur to Putrajaya (Malaysia Government Administrative Center).

However during the construction, the Seri Petaling interchange was subsequently added to the highway despite the lack of available land. This has led to the construction of the roads leading to interchange to reach the backyard of some houses which was not in the initial plan.

What this means is that the residents living under the highway will now be subjected to more noise and dust pollution with safety risk increased due to the increase in traffic as a result of the interchange. The interchange certain serves to the benefit of the concession holder as there will be more toll to be collected but at the expense of the residents who are also the citizens of Malaysia, mind you!

No Comments

Kenapakah Kontrak Lebuhraya KL-Putrajaya Tidak Diumumkan?

PEMBERITAHUAN PERTANYAAN BAGI JAWAB LISAN DEWAN RAKYAT

TARIKH: 24 FEBRUARI 2009 (SELASA)

SOALAN :

Puan Teresa Kok Suh Sim (Seputeh) minta MENTERI KERJA RAYA menyatakan sebab Kerajaan enggan mengumumkan kontrak Lebuh Raya KL-Putrajaya. Adakah ini disebabkan oleh Syarikat Konsesi Lebuh Raya KL-Putrajaya tidak menunaikan janjinya untuk membina bahagian jalan yang menyambung Putrajaya ke KLIA sebagaimana yang termaktub dalam persetujuannya dengan Kerajaan.

JAWAPAN :

Tuan Yang Di-Pertua.

Untuk makluman Ahli Yang Berhormat, pihak Kerajaan telah bersetuju untuk mendedahkan semua perjanjian konsesi bagi lebuhraya yang telah beroperasi. Walaubagaimanapun, Kerajaan tertakluk kepada klausa “confidentiality’ yang mana persetujuan Syarikat Konsesi Lebuhraya Kuala Lumpur-Putrajaya (Maju Expressway Sdn. Bhd) diperlukan sebelum Perjanjian Konsesi Lebuhraya Kuala Lumpur-Putrajaya didedahkan kepada umum. Syarikat konsesi tidak memberi persetujuan terhadap pendedahan perjanjian konsesi tersebut kepada umum.

Untuk makluman Yang Berhormat, Syarikat Konsesi telah mematuhi semua spesifikasi yang ditetapkan dalam perjanjian konsesi.

Berhubung dengan pembinaan Lebuhraya dari Putrajaya ke KLIA yang sepanjang 16 km, mengikut perjanjian konsesi, Syarikat hendaklah dalam masa 5 tahun daripada tarikh pewartaan kutipan TOL, mengemukakan laporan kepada Kerajaan berhubung pembinaan lebuhraya ini dari segi kewangan dan ekonomi, samada pembinaan lebuhraya ini ‘viable’ atau tidak.

, ,

No Comments

KL-Putrajaya Highway renamed to Maju Expressway (MEX)

The KL-Putrajaya highway was renamed to Maju Expressway recently. Here is an article from The Star which carried the story where the exercise has caused some inconvenience to road users due to poor pre-planning.

Click here for a listing of all the toll highway operators in Malaysia and their contact information.

No Comments

LLM impact survey follow up

Mr Lau, Tan and Au met up with Dato’ Shahrir on 21 Oct 2008 at Parliament. We updated him on our follow-up actions and conveyed to him re our proposed resolutions (immediate and long term). He agreed to bring the matter to the Minister and Cabinet.

Here is the follow up letter to LLM we sent recently. Basically we would like to know the next action after the completion of the impact survey. We hope they can mitigate the impact of noise and dust pollution immediately

We will be counting the time it takes for them to respond to us again.

, , , ,

No Comments

Some feedback…

Dear Lau,

I met one of the residents at the coffee shop, he is complaining the Mat Rempit issue! According to him, due to the straight road leading from 2/149 to Kuchai Lama, the illegal racing by both motorcycle and car had created sharp noise during midnight.

He propose to put up speed breaker such as road hump!

As for myself, due to traffic volume has increased since the opening of the road, the noise is unbearable especially on the wee hours especially around 5.30 to 6am. Normally i woke up this time due to noise.

I m seriuosly thinking of moving out ASAP if i can buy a new house nearby due to the noise. It’s really affected my living stantard!!

DBKL should PUT UP the noise barrier as agreed ASAP!

Other residents might be fed up with current situation and therefore they choose not to do anything even complaining.

I think the noise might not affected 2/149K that much if comparing to 2/149J as their houses stood on the higher groud!

Thanks

Best Regards
< identity withdrawn >

, ,

No Comments

Still no reply from LLM..

Ir Abdullah b HashimWe are still awating a reply from LLM. Based on the letter we sent earlier, LLM is supposed to get back to us on the survey impact results.

I did a quick search on LLM website on the addressee of our letter, Ir Abdullah b. Hashim. Apparently he is the Pengarah for Pembangunan dan Pemantauan Projek (Director of Project Development and Implementation). This is quite an important position but it should NOT be with someone who doesn’t reply correspondences.

No Comments